August 12th, 2008 21:23 EST
Did John Edwards' Lies About Consensual Sex Cost Hillary the Nomination
Liberals are about as amusing as lung cancer, especially when their corrupt minds are allowed to distort and play havoc with truth.
An excellent example is the recent statement made by a top Clinton aide who charged that John Edwards` failure to tell the truth about consensual sex cost Hillary Clinton the Democrat Party`s nomination for the presidency.
"I believe we would have won Iowa, and Clinton today would therefore have been the nominee," former Clinton Communications Director Howard Wolfson told ABCNews.com *
The fact that people just do not like or trust Hillary Clinton is immaterial, right Wolfson?
Hillary`s disapproval ratings hover near or above 50 percent and this fellow wants to blame John Edwards and his out-of-control zipper for doing in this 60 plus, old school, feminist bit**?
Besides, telling the truth is just not in the DNA of liberal politicians; a fact with which Hillary is quite familiar after suffering through 25 years of marriage to Slick Willie, and in light of the fact that she herself is a congenital liar.
Furthermore, Democrats just do not give a damn about lies involving consensual sex , or has Wolfson forgotten the mantra from the left when Slick Willie got caught with his libido in the clutches of White House intern Monica Lewinsky?
Clintonistas need to forgo the blame game and admit that their girl is too old, too liberal, too disliked, and too much of a liar to be anything except Junior senator from New York State, it self a disgraceful infestation of liberal mindlessness and lies.